EU-Taiwan Institute
iselingroup.com • brian.iselin(@)iselingroup.com
Iselin Group
🇪🇺

EU-China Relations Tracker 5.2/10

China: EU's largest trading partner EU: China's 2nd largest partner
Economic
6.8
Political
4.5
Security
3.2
Cultural
6.3

Trade & Investment

Total Trade (2024)
€732B
-2.4% YoY
Goods + Services
Goods Trade
€710B
-2.4% YoY
97% of total; both imports (-4.6%) & exports (-0.3%) declining
Services Trade Surplus
€21.7B
EU surplus
2024 data
EU FDI in China
€232B
Declining flows
Stock (2023); Q1 2025: €3.06B strongest since 2022
China FDI in EU
€65B
+80% in 2024 flows
Stock (2023)
EU Investment Flow to China
€10.1B
-8% YoY
2024 annual flow
China Investment Flow to EU
€9.4B
+80% YoY
2024 annual flow (rebound)
Trade Deficit
€306B
EU deficit (2024)
Goods trade imbalance

Bilateral Trade Flows (2024)

🇪🇺
European Union
€213B
EU Exports to China
China Exports to EU
€519B
🇨🇳
China
Top EU Exports: Machinery & vehicles (51%), Chemicals (17%), Other manufactured goods (20%)
Top China Exports: Machinery & vehicles (55%), Other manufactured goods (34%), Chemicals (8%)

Bilateral Trade Evolution 2020-2025

Trade Deficit Trend

Strategic Sectors & Competition

Electric Vehicles
Highcompetition
EU anti-subsidy investigation ongoing
Solar Panels
97%from China
EU dependency concern
Critical Raw Materials
Highexposure
Rare earths, lithium processing
5G Technology
Restrictedaccess
EU security concerns

Critical Minerals Dependency

Heavy Rare Earths
100%
EU sourced from China
Hybrid cars, fiber optics, nuclear
Magnesium
97%
EU dependency on China
Aerospace & automotive critical
Light Rare Earths
85%
EU sourced from China
Catalysts, magnets, engines
Catalysts, magnets, engines
Lithium
79%
China processing dominance
Battery production dependency
Gallium
71%
EU imports from China
Semiconductors, LEDs, solar
Cobalt Refining
70%
China-controlled processing
Scandium
67%
Aerospace components
Bismuth
65%
EU imports from China
Pharmaceuticals, low-melt alloys
Critical Raw Materials
34total
EU official 2020 list (not all China-dependent)
Rare Earth Magnet Production
90%
Global share controlled by China
Export Controls (2024-5)
Septemberenacted
7 materials restricted
Tightened April & Oct 2025
Licenses required for shipments
2030 Diversification Target
65%
Max single-country dependency

EU Dependency by Critical Mineral (% Sourced from China)

Heavy Rare Earths
100%
Magnesium
97%
Light Rare Earths
85%
Lithium
79%
Gallium
71%
Cobalt Refining
70%
Scandium
67%
Bismuth
65%
Vanadium
62%
Germanium
45%
Natural Graphite
40%
Tungsten
32%
Data source: European Commission research (2024), Bloomberg analysis. China controls 90% of global rare earth magnet production, creating chokepoint even for materials mined elsewhere.

EU Critical Raw Materials Act - Progress to 2030 Targets

Critical Minerals Dependency Details

The EU's dependency on China for critical minerals represents one of the most severe strategic vulnerabilities in the bilateral relationship. Europe is 100% dependent on China for heavy rare earth elements used in hybrid cars, fiber optics, and nuclear reactors, and 97% dependent for magnesium used in aerospace and automotive applications.

April 2025 Export Controls

In April 2025, China imposed export restrictions on seven rare earth materials and permanent magnets, requiring licenses for shipments. The impact was immediate: exports collapsed even as China's broader trade numbers surged. European carmakers have delayed production, while wind turbine and electronics sectors face spiraling costs.

The Processing Chokepoint

China's dominance extends beyond mining to refining and processing, controlling 90% of global rare earth magnet production. This means even materials mined elsewhere must typically pass through Chinese facilities for processing, creating an inescapable dependency.

EU Critical Raw Materials Act Targets (2030)

  • 10% of annual EU consumption from domestic extraction
  • 40% of annual EU consumption from domestic processing
  • 15% of annual EU consumption from recycling
  • Max 65% dependency on any single third country for each strategic raw material

Note: Current progress toward 2030 targets remains minimal for most materials. Heavy rare earths, in particular, have no viable alternative suppliers identified, making the 65% target unachievable without technological breakthroughs.

Engagement by Policy Area (2025)

Trade
88%
Investment
72%
Climate Change
65%
Technology Standards
58%
Human Rights
35%
Security Cooperation
28%

Risk & Resilience Indicators

Trade Imbalance
High Risk
€306B deficit in 2024; persistent structural imbalance in goods trade
Economic Dependencies
High Risk
Critical dependencies on solar panels (97%), rare earths, and key industrial inputs
Market Access
Medium Risk
Lack of level playing field; EU businesses face discrimination and regulatory barriers

Political & Diplomatic Engagement

Annual Summits
1per year
Presidential-level
High-Level Dialogues
HLETDannual
VP-level economic talks
Diplomatic Relations
Since 1975
50 years of engagement
Strategic Classification
Triplerole
Partner, competitor, rival

Key Milestones in EU-China Relations

Diplomatic Relations
1975
First EU-China Summit
1998
China Joins WTO
2001
Investment Agreement
2020
FDI Screening
2020
De-risking Strategy
2023
EV Investigation
2023

EU Trade Relations: Comparative Context

Methodology & Assessment Framework

Iselin Group Engagement Assessment Methodology

The engagement scores and overall rating presented in this tracker represent proprietary assessments by Iselin Group based on comprehensive analysis of publicly available data, official statements, and bilateral activities.

Overall Score Calculation (5.2/10)

The overall engagement score is derived from four equally-weighted pillars:

  • Economic Integration (6.8/10): High trade volume but massive deficit; significant FDI but declining EU investment
  • Political Dialogue (4.5/10): Regular summits but strained relations; "triple role" classification reflects complexity
  • Security Cooperation (3.2/10): Minimal cooperation; systemic rival classification; technology concerns
  • Cultural Exchange (6.3/10): Student exchanges, tourism, but limited people-to-people depth

Sector Engagement Intensity (Policy Area Scores)

Percentage scores for individual sectors reflect both volume of interaction and quality of cooperation, adjusted for competitive/adversarial dynamics.

Risk Assessment Framework

Risk levels represent Iselin Group's assessment based on official EU strategic communications and economic data:

  • High Risk - Trade Imbalance: €306B deficit represents structural vulnerability
  • High Risk - Dependencies: Critical exposure in solar, rare earths, batteries
  • Medium Risk - Market Access: Lack of reciprocity, discrimination against EU firms

Disclaimer: All assessments, scores, and ratings in this tracker represent independent analysis by Iselin Group. While based on publicly available official data and reports, the interpretive framework and scoring methodology are proprietary. Last updated: October 14, 2025.

Primary Data Sources

  • European Commission (DG Trade)
  • Eurostat Trade Statistics
  • European External Action Service (EEAS)
  • European Parliament
  • Chinese National Bureau of Statistics
  • WTO Dispute Settlement Body
  • Official bilateral statements & summits

Analysis & Assessment

  • Iselin Group proprietary scoring methodology
  • Quantitative trade & investment analysis
  • Diplomatic engagement tracking
  • Strategic risk assessment framework
  • Sectoral competition analysis
  • De-risking strategy evaluation
  • Comparative benchmarking
  • See full methodology section above
Iselin Group - Strategic Consulting
© Iselin Group. "EU-China Relations Tracker" — brian.iselin(@)iselingroup.com.
The underlying decision‑integrity model, logic, and UI are proprietary to Iselin Group and may not be reproduced, adapted, or deployed in whole or in part without prior written consent; all rights reserved.